Lumen 2018

409 The End of Father Stanislaus’s Life 57. We do not know their exact number, for their originals did not survive to our times and the preserved copies may simply be col- lections of only some of the requests. Today, we know them from the copy of the Protocol of 1744. Bishop Wierzbowski’s request is known from a copy made by a notary in 1773 and is the only one that was published. 58. A request to the Holy See from Bishop Jerome Wierzbowski, Administrator of the Diocese of Poznan, March 20, 1699, § 1, Positio 522. 59. A request to the Holy Father from Bishop George A. Denhoff, Ordinary of the Diocese of Przemysl, August 2, 1699, Positio 526. A request from George Denhoff, Bishop Ordinary of the Diocese of Przemysl, to Cardinal G. Marescotti, August 2, 1699, Positio 527. In 1685, George Denhoff (1640-1702) became the Bishop of Kamieniec; in 1687, he was transferred to Przemysl and assumed the office of the Bishop of Przemysl in 1690; in 1688, he was given the title of the Great Chancellor of Poland; in 1700, he became the Bishop of Cracow. PEK 7-8 (1906), 401 a; HierCat, vol. V, 138. 175. 324. 60. A request from John Lasocki, Cupbearer for the Region of Lukow, February 25, 1699, Positio 530. 61. A request from Stanislaus Grzybowski, Standard Bearer for the Region of Czersk, March 20, 1699, Positio 531. 62. Requests from Francis Grzybowski, Castellan of Inowroclaw, March 20, 1699, Positio 533-534. 63. Requests from Alexander G. Zaluski, Palatine of Rawa, March 22, 1699, Positio 535-537. 64. J. Nowacki, Dzieje Archid. Pozn ., vol. II, 188. 65. L. Pastor, op. cit., XV, 5; PEK vol. 25-26, 273. 66. VF § 49.