Lumen 2018

S TANISLAUS P APCZYNSKI 244 250. Letter prepared for Fr. Papczynski by Nicholas Oborski, Aux- iliary Bishop of Cracow, February 23, 1671, Positio 229. 251. W. Meysztowicz, op. cit., 85; L. Pastor, op. cit., vol. XIV/1, 566-567, 661-662. 252. Letter of recommendation by Nicholas Oborski, Auxiliary Bishop of Cracow, issued for Papczynski and addressed to the Apostolic Nuncio in Poland, February 23, 1671. [Literae Commendatoriae ad Nuntium Apostolicum Ejusdem Suffra- ganei Cracoviensis], Positio 232. 253. “Non sine iniuria mea aliqua tandem transacta.” Fundatio § 7, Scripta 84. 254. Positio 231. 255. Kraus 10, Positio 328. 256. Kraus 7, Positio 329. 257. “Scholarum namque piarum paupertas aeque stricta est, atque Capucinorum, excepto eo, quod pro anno victualia comparari possint. At certe nulla bona stabilia admittere licet Scholis Piis, neque titulo haereditario, neque titulo donationis, immo nec Census annuos admittere poterant ... supellex quoque ecclesi- astica, summae paupertati consona, nihil sericei, nihil aurei, vel argentei, excepta cuppa calicis pati deberet.” Apologia § 35, Scripta 61-62. 258. “Egregius Reformator!” Kraus 10, Positio 330. 259. Excerpt from the records of the provincial chapter, August 3, 1676, and from its approval, May 18, 1677, Positio 237; Fun- datio § 6, Scripta 83. 260. “Novere non pauci, qui fuerim in mihi vita mea carioribus Scholis Piis in illa Pauperum Matris Dei suavissima Societate, quanti meam vocationem nonnisi a Deo provectam aesti- maverim sit hoc explicatu dificillimum. Tenebar praeterea in illo